Yep. As someone who had previously donated to them, I felt betrayed that they'd jeopardize their very important and virtually one-of-a-kind internet archive in

Yep. As someone who had previously donated to them, I felt betrayed that they'd jeopardize their very important and virtually one-of-a-kind internet archive in order to pull a stupid stunt where they practically admitted that they were breaking the law. How am I supposed to trust them to responsibly manage their collections and money now? If you want to blatantly break copyright law to make a point, and hope that you'll somehow get off by asking the judge nicely, do it in some isolated org please. Not with the wallet of a major modern museum