12 ms·
It's quid pro quo, isn't it. The repo is buying stars with bug reporting as currency. Which may well be against GitHub rules but more than that, it's a stupid
by oliwarner 3y ago
It's quid pro quo, isn't it. The repo is buying stars with bug reporting as currency.
Which may well be against GitHub rules but more than that, it's a stupid thing to do. Bug reporting helps projects get better. They're blocking real bug reports until they get a star. Seems like self-harm to me.
- franciscop 3y ago> Bug reporting helps projects get better There's many cases where that's not true and indeed low-quality bug reports hurt the projects from getting better, specially for mid-to-high popular solo projects. Think about it in more familiar terms, are more job offers good for searching for a job? It might seems so, but only if you think about well-timed high quality offers. Suddenly getting spammed on your email, linkedin, etc. with dozens+ of low-quality job offers would def not be helpful.
- skywal_l 3y ago> There's many cases where that's not true and indeed low-quality bug reports hurt the projects from getting better, specially for mid-to-high popular solo projects. So it's ok to report low quality bugs as long as you give stars? I know that's not your argument, but this is what this thread is about.
- actionfromafar 3y agoMaybe not, but at least they got a star out of it. Github sets up social network gamification incentives, wins social network gamification prizes…
- johnnyanmac 3y agoWell yes. And like any good game you should report abuse of its features.