3 ms·
Lichess ratings are higher generally, although they even out with chess.com the higher you get. 1400 on lichess is more like 1200 on chess.com, but 1900 is pro
by zpeti 3y ago
Lichess ratings are higher generally, although they even out with chess.com the higher you get.
1400 on lichess is more like 1200 on chess.com, but 1900 is probably 1900.
Based on your post though, you definitely seem like you are very smart or have a natural affinity for chess. 1900 is extremely high, especially in a few months or even years.
Normally people gain around 300 ELO points per year if they are learning and practicing actively.
- V-2 3y ago> 1400 on lichess is more like 1200 on chess.com, but 1900 is probably 1900. Not in my experience. I'm rated 1900+ on lichess and 1600+ on chess.com. That's after playing a significant number of games (nearly 500 on chess.com, thousands on lichess). The way I feel about it, a 1900 player on lichess is an intermediate beginner (like myself), whereas 1900 on chess.com already represents a decent club player level. For reference, "in real life" (Elo rating / FIDE) I'm rated below 1300 in classical chess, and about 1400 in rapid - although I've played only one rapid tournament, and I don't have a blitz rating at all, which makes comparisons a bit tricky. For what it's worth though, as far as I can tell, these proportions are about typical.