3 ms·

> Again, I love the fact that you, just like the people I talked about in my first fucking comment, treat me like I'm stupid, despite the fact that I know what

> Again, I love the fact that you, just like the people I talked about in my first fucking comment, treat me like I'm stupid, despite the fact that I know what I'm doing I treat you like you're stupid because you present stupid little issues as insurmountable problems. > (hell, enough to reproduce 90% of iTunes's features in my own media library/player) Programmers IMO are some of the worst for jumping to "I can do this better!" instead of again attempting to solve the problem. > You even imply that I run to whinning instead of Googling. Why don't you Google these issues. You'll find dozens of other people with the exact same issue. I don't imply it, I say it. Because you do. Also, Google offers the EXACT same solution: Clean up your machine because if it can't write a 30mb file that isn't even being read without locking up, there is something wrong with it. > You wasted a lot of effort typing that reply. Personally I think it was used perfectly. > One of my more infuriating replies I've gotten here. Yeah, being challenged on your BS can be frustrating. I'm glad I could be a part of that. > Annnnnd a quick look at your other comments in this thread tell me everything I need to know. You're even running around telling other people describing the exact same problem and acting like they're crazy. You call it crazy, I call it lazy. Whatever, it's still bitching over fixing. I'm not calling them crazy for having the problem, I'm calling them lazy for having the problem for so long and just bitching about it instead of doing something about it. > You realize that something working for you doesn't mean it's bug free, right? Of course, just because something isn't working on a particular setup doesn't mean its bug-ridden either.

drivebyacct2 15y ago
>I don't imply it, I say it. Because you do. >Why don't you Google these issues. You'll find dozens of other people with the exact same issue. You're a stupid little fuck, aren't you. I DID Google them instead of whining first. You really think I sunk probably a hundred hours into writing something purely from scratch before Googling. Good god how can you breath with your head that far up Apple's ass? >Of course, just because something isn't working on a particular setup doesn't mean its bug-ridden either. And we've always been at war with Oceania.
- shinratdr 15y ago
  LOL, Hey I'm not the one who insists he is a programmer and yet can't solve the missing items issue in iTunes. You can hire this stupid little fuck for $100/hr, I'll solve all your impossible iTunes problems. If you're really that retarded, I'm sure it will be money well spent. > Good god how can you breath with your head that far up Apple's ass? ...You presented the problem, idiot. I'm not just guessing as to what your issue was. You presented the simplest iTunes problem in the world to solve, and then acted like it was sufficient motivation to write a competitor. Head up Apple's ass? I'm not the one so blinded by marketing I expect it to immediately work without issue. It's still software. The only one with unrealistic expectations of iTunes is you, namely that it should function perfectly on a machine that can't write 30mb without locking up. > And we've always been at war with Oceania. Give a break. Here: Send me your music player, $20 says I can get it to crash on launch.
  - drivebyacct2 15y ago
    You're a real piece of work. Do you understand the definition of confirmation bias? Does the likely over a dozen point difference in our comment scores on your our posts here not give you any indication that this just might not be an isolated issue? Or are you one of these people that is never wrong and can't admit that you might not have experienced every possible use case or code path of iTunes? Seriously, do you understand the absurdity of what you're claiming, outside of this application or your or I's anecdotes... that the claim that the software is bug free or works perfectly for everyone is just an outlandishly stupid thing to claim as an absolute? >Give a break. Here: Send me your music player, $20 says I can get it to crash on launch. Soon enough, I'm preparing to release it by the end of May. I'm not really sure how you plan on crashing it given it's design, but it's cute that you continue to make absurd assumptions and personal attacks.
    - shinratdr 15y ago
      > Does the likely over a dozen point difference in our comment scores on your our posts here not give you any indication that this just might not be an isolated issue? I can't see the point difference between our comments, how would I know that? Moreover, why should I care? Congrats, you've proven other techs also don't like things that confuse them and would prefer to join in your bitching. > Or are you one of these people that is never wrong and can't admit that you might not have experienced every possible use case or code path of iTunes? You're acting like I'm saying iTunes is perfect. It's not, it's riddled with issues and a frank conversation on it's future is important. I'm just saying the issues most techs present to me, including the one you did, are the simplest issues to solve and indicative of a weird attitude techs have towards iTunes, where they assume it will fuck them over before trying anything to solve the problem. If you had presented a real issue, I wouldn't have even continued. You instead presented the simplest one that only happens to novice users, so I laid into you appropriately. > Seriously, do you understand the absurdity of what you're claiming, outside of this application or your or I's anecdotes... that the claim that the software is bug free or works perfectly for everyone is just an outlandishly stupid thing to claim as an absolute? That is a ridiculous claim. Good thing I never once said that. > but it's cute that you continue to make absurd assumptions and personal attacks. My point was that any software on a machine with sufficient issues can crash. That wasn't an "absurd assumption or personal attack" it was verifiable truth.

drivebyacct2 15y ago

>I don't imply it, I say it. Because you do. >Why don't you Google these issues. You'll find dozens of other people with the exact same issue. You're a stupid little fuck, aren't you. I DID Google them instead of whining first. You really think I sunk probably a hundred hours into writing something purely from scratch before Googling. Good god how can you breath with your head that far up Apple's ass? >Of course, just because something isn't working on a particular setup doesn't mean its bug-ridden either. And we've always been at war with Oceania.

shinratdr 15y ago
LOL, Hey I'm not the one who insists he is a programmer and yet can't solve the missing items issue in iTunes. You can hire this stupid little fuck for $100/hr, I'll solve all your impossible iTunes problems. If you're really that retarded, I'm sure it will be money well spent. > Good god how can you breath with your head that far up Apple's ass? ...You presented the problem, idiot. I'm not just guessing as to what your issue was. You presented the simplest iTunes problem in the world to solve, and then acted like it was sufficient motivation to write a competitor. Head up Apple's ass? I'm not the one so blinded by marketing I expect it to immediately work without issue. It's still software. The only one with unrealistic expectations of iTunes is you, namely that it should function perfectly on a machine that can't write 30mb without locking up. > And we've always been at war with Oceania. Give a break. Here: Send me your music player, $20 says I can get it to crash on launch.
- drivebyacct2 15y ago
  You're a real piece of work. Do you understand the definition of confirmation bias? Does the likely over a dozen point difference in our comment scores on your our posts here not give you any indication that this just might not be an isolated issue? Or are you one of these people that is never wrong and can't admit that you might not have experienced every possible use case or code path of iTunes? Seriously, do you understand the absurdity of what you're claiming, outside of this application or your or I's anecdotes... that the claim that the software is bug free or works perfectly for everyone is just an outlandishly stupid thing to claim as an absolute? >Give a break. Here: Send me your music player, $20 says I can get it to crash on launch. Soon enough, I'm preparing to release it by the end of May. I'm not really sure how you plan on crashing it given it's design, but it's cute that you continue to make absurd assumptions and personal attacks.
  - shinratdr 15y ago
    > Does the likely over a dozen point difference in our comment scores on your our posts here not give you any indication that this just might not be an isolated issue? I can't see the point difference between our comments, how would I know that? Moreover, why should I care? Congrats, you've proven other techs also don't like things that confuse them and would prefer to join in your bitching. > Or are you one of these people that is never wrong and can't admit that you might not have experienced every possible use case or code path of iTunes? You're acting like I'm saying iTunes is perfect. It's not, it's riddled with issues and a frank conversation on it's future is important. I'm just saying the issues most techs present to me, including the one you did, are the simplest issues to solve and indicative of a weird attitude techs have towards iTunes, where they assume it will fuck them over before trying anything to solve the problem. If you had presented a real issue, I wouldn't have even continued. You instead presented the simplest one that only happens to novice users, so I laid into you appropriately. > Seriously, do you understand the absurdity of what you're claiming, outside of this application or your or I's anecdotes... that the claim that the software is bug free or works perfectly for everyone is just an outlandishly stupid thing to claim as an absolute? That is a ridiculous claim. Good thing I never once said that. > but it's cute that you continue to make absurd assumptions and personal attacks. My point was that any software on a machine with sufficient issues can crash. That wasn't an "absurd assumption or personal attack" it was verifiable truth.