> This was not a causal study; the study did not analyze the reason for an incident. Therefore, this was not a study. It was counting something to be able to

> This was not a causal study; the study did not analyze the reason for an incident. Therefore, this was not a study. It was counting something to be able to publish a number, write an article with a laughably indefensible conclusion in an attempt to generate viral results. Silly rabbits.