> what about when people actually have a good model, and a disinformation stream replaces that with a bad model, or causes them to just say 'nothing is true'?

> what about when people actually have a good model, and a disinformation stream replaces that with a bad model, or causes them to just say 'nothing is true'? Do they actually have a good model? Or a flawed model with good intentions? Global warming stands out as a prime example where many accepted the general idea in theory back when it was a novel concept, but under a flawed model, and when the flawed model didn't stand up to practical use the conversations began... There was an attempt to rebrand the idea as climate change to try and reset the clock, so to speak, but in many ways that only confused the issue further.