2 ms·
My issue is that we’ve been trained to see things on a broken scale - 10 is good, 9 is good, 8 is probably ok, 7 is questionable and everything else is really b
by jmye 3y ago
My issue is that we’ve been trained to see things on a broken scale - 10 is good, 9 is good, 8 is probably ok, 7 is questionable and everything else is really bad.
I get it’s chicken/egg, but I feel like you can’t adjust ratings without retraining people on what ratings mean. I guess that means I think we should probably do away with the numbers and think about a more qualitative approach? Not a strong belief.
- fsckboy 3y agothere needs to be a way to indicate something exceptionally good, and everything can't be that. if 5 is the center of the new scale where the current grade inflation puts everything, people will not need to be retrained. Then, let them vote. You don't need to understand grading on a curve to be graded on a curve, and the grade you get is the right one.