4 ms·
It discussed both personal actions and regulations as a counter to the current status quo. Regulations often limit what can be done, and probably will have to i
by pavon 3y ago
It discussed both personal actions and regulations as a counter to the current status quo. Regulations often limit what can be done, and probably will have to if they are to be effective given how legal consent has become watered down to the point of being meaningless.
- antonvs 3y agoRight, but it in no way suggested that "some New Yorker columnist wants to choose what technology [we] can or cannot have," which is what the other commenter was whipping himself into a froth about.