>Why should they have to justify providing free software? They don't, but they have to be honest about what they're presenting. There's this shitty motte-and-b

>Why should they have to justify providing free software? They don't, but they have to be honest about what they're presenting. There's this shitty motte-and-bailey situation in open source where their website ( https://librumreader.com/ https://librumreader.com/ ) looks like marketing for a serious application - but the moment you treat it like a serious application, people are like "it's free, why are you treating it like a serious application?". Look: >Simplicity >Focus on what actually matters, using a simple and straight forward interface. >Your time is too valuable to be wasted on complex applications. What does the tone here convey? Is it "this is just a cool project I wrote"?