4 ms·
That would be your assumption due to your own political bias. That reflects on you, not me. Like I legitimately just want the system to be more efficient lol.
by aydyn 3y ago
That would be your assumption due to your own political bias.
That reflects on you, not me.
Like I legitimately just want the system to be more efficient lol. It must be hard for you to talk to people?
- neuronerdgirl 3y agoIf you "legitimately" want efficiency then you support just giving people $250 outright in cash, not locking it behind food stamps. How inefficient is it to give people 250 that theyre locked to spending on only one aspect of their lives? I would posit, having done it myself, that you could easily feed yourself and probably at least 2 people on half that. If the people are left with 125 that they can ONLY use on food, of course they'll use it for junk - at least that gives them some value at least as far as life enjoyment even if it's bad for them. Give them cash and I would bet they'd put it to much better use on bills, outstanding debts, laundry, etc.