3 ms·

> work done with AI will not hold the same kind of value that is intrinsic to other form It will hold a different kind of value. What that means to the individ

> work done with AI will not hold the same kind of value that is intrinsic to other form It will hold a different kind of value. What that means to the individual is something they have to decide for themselves. I for one love new things and progress, but I can also understand a more conservative mindset even if I feel differently. I am also tired of people screeching „AI is not art!!1!“ and trying to deplatform and attack people who feel otherwise (not insinuating that you do this by the way).

haswell 3y ago
Yeah, I agree it will hold a different kind of value. I don’t think people should be screeching about this either. I do think people are screeching because they enjoy traditional art and they think traditional art is threatened. I’m starting to see this more like computerized chess. When a computer first beat a human, it didn’t end chess. Chess is alive and well, because humans like playing chess. With that said, the chess community is also more susceptible to cheating than it has ever been, and has suffered controversy as a result. I think AI art will be similar. People who want traditional art will keep wanting it. People who create it will keep creating it. The people on both sides of this exchange aren’t going to suddenly stop valuing the things they valued before. But like chess, AI tools make it easy for people to misrepresent themselves, and people will absolutely try to pass off their creations as original. I suspect that over time, tools will catch up and people who eschew AI tooling will be valued for it. It’s just gonna be a mess for awhile.