4 ms·
Yeah; the language was almost fine, but every few seconds my brain went "uhhh... what?" I almost couldn't tell you what was wrong, but it was clearly wrong.
by dtgriscom 3y ago
Yeah; the language was almost fine, but every few seconds my brain went "uhhh... what?" I almost couldn't tell you what was wrong, but it was clearly wrong.
- Terr_ 3y agoYeah, even if we accept "creepy robotic recitation" as an unavoidable overarching style, there are errors like: > Automatic vacuum-type with quantative [quantitative] soybean deliver [delivery]. > Water level control - It can control the soaking time and auto-washing remove [removes] impurities. > Quantative [Quantitative] soybean and water feeding can stable [stabilize] soymilk concentration control.
- klipt 3y agoQuantitive is actually a word: https://grammarist.com/usage/quantitative-quantitive/ https://grammarist.com/usage/quantitative-quantitive/
- Terr_ 3y agoIn this context (international sales of heavy machinery), I'd argue "quantative" is a mistake even if it were "legitimate but rare". That said, I think there's still a strong case it's an ancient-mistake in general. Not only is it missing from some spell-checkers, but it appears so extraordinarily rarely [0] compared to "quantitative" that it's hard to see it as a synonym rather than a typo. [0] https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=quantitative%2Cquantative%2Ccalendar%2Ccalender%2C+colleague%2Ccolleage&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3 https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=quantitative%2...