I was curious about Apple appealing to the Biden administration to veto the ruling because it sounded quite arbitrary from the last paragraph "Apple has had suc

I was curious about Apple appealing to the Biden administration to veto the ruling because it sounded quite arbitrary from the last paragraph "Apple has had success persuading presidents in the past to veto I.T.C. rulings. In 2013, the Obama administration overturned a ban on the sale of some iPhones and iPads, after the court determined that Apple had violated a patent that Samsung owned." However, turns out the veto was just on blocking the sales rather than stopping the patent litigation, so even if Apple do get the Biden administration to veto the block and they can start selling phones again, that doesn't solve the dispute. As far as I understand it, this is the judge getting fed up with one or both of Apple and Masimo (presumably Apple given that they're the one being told to stop selling products) dicking about rather than coming to a settlement.