3 ms·
The US got great bang for the buck at the beginning of the war but diminishing marginal returns set in as soon as the spring offensive flopped. The warmongers w
by tiahura 3y ago
The US got great bang for the buck at the beginning of the war but diminishing marginal returns set in as soon as the spring offensive flopped. The warmongers who declare that Europe is at risk and we must keep throwing money away should be ignored.
You don’t need a phd in Russian studies to understand that Putin rues the day he listened to his advisers. Can you imagine some KGB colonel going to Putin and saying “Let’s invade Lithuania”?
One of Zelenskyy’s comedian buddies needs to tell him it’s time to negotiate.
- brnt 3y agoIt's still bang for buck: Russian loss rates are increasing. But at any rate, it takes time to reduce stocks to zero.
- Detrytus 3y agoThat was US plan all along: give Ukraine enough help so that they can continue the war, but not win. That's because Ukraine winning can have unpredictable effects on Russia internal affairs, including attempted coup, chaos, and someone accidentally launching nukes. Meanwhile, continued war drains Russian resources and keeps them occupied.
- duhast 3y agoRetaking of Kharkiv and Kherson is marginal diminishing returns?