2 ms·
I'm somewhat okay with this - it doesn't mean the barrier of proof should be zero, but in that many of these "influencers" are openly chasing follower and view
by FireBeyond 3y ago
I'm somewhat okay with this - it doesn't mean the barrier of proof should be zero, but in that many of these "influencers" are openly chasing follower and view counts (dare I say some are addicted to it?) then I'm okay with not enabling that.
You don't need to link to CSAM sites to talk about issues like that. Similar to not needing to link to the worst of rotten.com or whatever just to make observations on it.
> I attempted to google and immediately found a footage matching their description, but not from tiktokers but from television news.
My perception has been that tiktok isn't particularly well indexed by Google.
- nullc 3y agoYuck example, but it's a point. We aren't talking about something as extreme here, however. Given that hyperbole in journalism is common, I think we ought to hope for enough information to validate where it wouldn't be reprehensible or unlawful to provide it. I was guilty of hyperbole myself with the worthless comment, thanks for the reality check. :) (and fortunately you could see the article and judge that I'd overstated it!)