3 ms·
How does this not trivially exclude everything (the first definition, not the circular restatement)? Considering that, say, a sequence of coin flips either has
by jasomill 15y ago
How does this not trivially exclude everything (the first definition, not the circular restatement)? Considering that, say, a sequence of coin flips either has the property of "beginning with heads" or "beginning with tails," it certainly appears to.
- pierrebouchet 15y agoMy bad, I was being too vague - sorry for that. I meant "any atypical property" instead of "any property". An "atypical property" being a property that almost no sequence has, i.e the set of sequences which exhibit this propery is a measure-zero set.