I believe it comes at the exact time -and in opposition to- of the masses coming to terms with the climate change challenge. We have to transition away from fo

I believe it comes at the exact time -and in opposition to- of the masses coming to terms with the climate change challenge. We have to transition away from fossil fuels, but they are so intertwined with our lives it also means strong degrowth (count the times transporting was necessary to your activity today, or the number of times you touched a plastic or steel item, or just consider half your nitrogen came from an industrial Haber process column) SV's philosophy is based on growth, and this is anathema. IMHO this is a half-conscious attempt to impose an alternative, or to shed future potential obligations. It feels like we're in a Greek tragedy: everyone plays the role one was made to honestly play, and that makes the catastrophe inevitable.