3 ms·
>> Counterpoint: rust is doing fine without those organizations and industries. Why change what is working well? Because Rust is a game changer. Wouldn't it b
by thesuperbigfrog 3y ago
>> Counterpoint: rust is doing fine without those organizations and industries. Why change what is working well?
Because Rust is a game changer.
Wouldn't it be better to have Rust used for the code that runs on automobiles and aircraft? Or you would prefer that they keep using (subsets of) C and C++?
Is the security of your Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices good enough or could they be better?
What do you have against Rust being used in more places and for more purposes?
- faitswulff 3y agoFerrous Systems has a basically bog standard Rust 1.68 compiler that’s been certified for use in the most safety critical environments: https://ferrous-systems.com/blog/officially-qualified-ferrocene/ https://ferrous-systems.com/blog/officially-qualified-ferroc... This happened without a standard.
- thesuperbigfrog 3y ago>> This happened without a standard. They created a specification for Ferrocene: https://spec.ferrocene.dev/ https://spec.ferrocene.dev/ While it is technically not a Rust language standard, it serves a similar purpose for Ferrocene.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]