3 ms·
This is not the takeaway I got. The takeaway I got was the review process improved the paper and made it more rigorous. How is that a bad thing? But yes, someti
by mempko 3y ago
This is not the takeaway I got. The takeaway I got was the review process improved the paper and made it more rigorous. How is that a bad thing? But yes, sometimes reviewers are focusing on different issues instead of 'is this going to revolutionize A, B, and C'.
- huijzer 3y agoI currently have a paper under review (first round) that was submitted the 2nd of August. This is at the second journal. The first submission was a few months before that. I'm not sure peer review makes things more rigorous, but it surely makes it more slow.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]