4 ms·

Of course in our “freedom of speech” democratic western culture you can’t say this. How dare you? Ukraine on its own can’t win this war. Russia has way more res

Of course in our “freedom of speech” democratic western culture you can’t say this. How dare you? Ukraine on its own can’t win this war. Russia has way more reserves, people and resources. Not even talking about nuclear weapons. Do you really think Russia will accept losing this war? A nuclear superpower? Last resort they can send some nukes. So, why continue sending more weapons and money to a war which if escalates we all lose?

cmrdporcupine 3y ago
There is no way Russia lets off nukes in Ukraine or around this issue. They would have done so already if they were that stupid. It would be completely mutually assured destruction, assuming their nukes even work. Not to mention Russian civilians are downwind from Ukraine anyways. Radiation fallout would poison the entire region. Even the use of a "tactical" nuke or chemical weapons would be a red line that NATO would treat as an escalation that would end with the complete elimination of Russian defensive lines from the air and the end of Russian air supremacy in eastern Ukraine, and I'm sure Biden has communicated this very clearly to Putin behind the scenes. Russia is treading a strategically thin line. Unless Trump gets back in the Whitehouse. And funny to see you put "freedom of speech" in quotes, while you post in a completely public forum without sanction. Shoot your mouth off wrong in Russia and you'll end up in a jail cell. It sounds more like your problem is that you expect people to just ... agree with you? But the problem is you're wrong. Behind Ukraine is a giant contiguous geographic area of allies with supplies and armaments superior to Russia's, and an economic & industrial capacity many multiples of it. What is required, is will from leadership and a population that doesn't fall for Russian propaganda, like you have.
- mdavid626 3y ago
  This is exactly what the problem is. If you don’t agree with the mainstream “save Ukraine” mantra, then you “fell for Russian propaganda”. The only accepted opinion is to fight at all costs. Nothing else is accepted. How is this democratic? I’m not for Russia, nor against, but don’t support of killing even more people. If there would be freedom of speech, then you could discuss this openly and publicly. I believe in Russia you can also post on the internet, at least anonymously. There is the right way (pro Ukraine) and the wrong way. Why? So, how exactly will Ukraine win this war? And at what cost? How would Russia accept losing? I believe you don’t have an answer.
  - cmrdporcupine 3y ago
    Nobody is stopping you from having your opinion, or voicing it, so stop blathering like you're being censored. Your privilege is showing -- or are you just used to being agreed with and getting your way? As for the cost -- the expense is human lives and untold misery. Which is the unacceptable cost of every war. Which is why bullies use it as a tool, in hopes that their foe will submit because the cost is unbearable. It's brutally unpalatable and inhumane to continue with war. But the alternative is worse. BTW last week Putin made it clear that no "peace" at the current borders will be permitted and that their original goals remain, which is (at a minimum) the merge into Russia of all the Kharkiv, Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia, and Kherson oblasts, the elimination of the gov't in Ukraine (and presumably its replacement with a puppet regime), and no EU membership and certainly no NATO protection. So basically 1/2 the territory of Ukraine, including its most productive agricultural and industrial lands, the bulk of its Black Sea coastline, and it become a client state. That's peace?
    - mdavid626 3y ago
      It is not our war (I’m not Ukranian, nor Russian). I understand that it is bad and unacceptable that Putin does this and I also want to stop it, but not at all costs. To me enough lives were already lost and I don’t see how can we win. Maybe this is unacceptable to many people, but I prefer the interest of my own country, my family and friends. I’m open to help, but again, not at all costs. I don’t see how is it in our interest to be at war with Russia (I’m from Europe).
      - jnsaff2 3y ago
        So aggression gets rewarded by handing them something they wanted. Do you really think that this is the end, this is all they wanted and from now on they are peaceful world citizens? Every time you hand something to aggressors you need to hand them more the next time. How many km between russia and the border of the country where you live? For me it's 0. You either help Ukraine now or be ready to fight yourself sometime in the future. It's like in the winter you are cold and you pee in your pants. It will be warm for a moment end then what?
ponector 3y ago
Nuclear weapon in current world is an expensive show of power, but completely useless. No one can use it. If you think that after retreat from Ukraine Russian will use nukes - you are consuming too much Russian propaganda.
- mdavid626 3y ago
  I think you misunderstood me. I meant last, last resort. When Russia’s existence is threatened, when they have no other options, I think they won’t hesitate to blow up the whole world.
webknjaz 3y ago
This viewpoint couldn't be more ruscist. Why do you push the terrorist mass murderer propaganda so hard?

cmrdporcupine 3y ago

There is no way Russia lets off nukes in Ukraine or around this issue. They would have done so already if they were that stupid. It would be completely mutually assured destruction, assuming their nukes even work. Not to mention Russian civilians are downwind from Ukraine anyways. Radiation fallout would poison the entire region. Even the use of a "tactical" nuke or chemical weapons would be a red line that NATO would treat as an escalation that would end with the complete elimination of Russian defensive lines from the air and the end of Russian air supremacy in eastern Ukraine, and I'm sure Biden has communicated this very clearly to Putin behind the scenes. Russia is treading a strategically thin line. Unless Trump gets back in the Whitehouse. And funny to see you put "freedom of speech" in quotes, while you post in a completely public forum without sanction. Shoot your mouth off wrong in Russia and you'll end up in a jail cell. It sounds more like your problem is that you expect people to just ... agree with you? But the problem is you're wrong. Behind Ukraine is a giant contiguous geographic area of allies with supplies and armaments superior to Russia's, and an economic & industrial capacity many multiples of it. What is required, is will from leadership and a population that doesn't fall for Russian propaganda, like you have.

mdavid626 3y ago
This is exactly what the problem is. If you don’t agree with the mainstream “save Ukraine” mantra, then you “fell for Russian propaganda”. The only accepted opinion is to fight at all costs. Nothing else is accepted. How is this democratic? I’m not for Russia, nor against, but don’t support of killing even more people. If there would be freedom of speech, then you could discuss this openly and publicly. I believe in Russia you can also post on the internet, at least anonymously. There is the right way (pro Ukraine) and the wrong way. Why? So, how exactly will Ukraine win this war? And at what cost? How would Russia accept losing? I believe you don’t have an answer.
- cmrdporcupine 3y ago
  Nobody is stopping you from having your opinion, or voicing it, so stop blathering like you're being censored. Your privilege is showing -- or are you just used to being agreed with and getting your way? As for the cost -- the expense is human lives and untold misery. Which is the unacceptable cost of every war. Which is why bullies use it as a tool, in hopes that their foe will submit because the cost is unbearable. It's brutally unpalatable and inhumane to continue with war. But the alternative is worse. BTW last week Putin made it clear that no "peace" at the current borders will be permitted and that their original goals remain, which is (at a minimum) the merge into Russia of all the Kharkiv, Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia, and Kherson oblasts, the elimination of the gov't in Ukraine (and presumably its replacement with a puppet regime), and no EU membership and certainly no NATO protection. So basically 1/2 the territory of Ukraine, including its most productive agricultural and industrial lands, the bulk of its Black Sea coastline, and it become a client state. That's peace?
  - mdavid626 3y ago
    It is not our war (I’m not Ukranian, nor Russian). I understand that it is bad and unacceptable that Putin does this and I also want to stop it, but not at all costs. To me enough lives were already lost and I don’t see how can we win. Maybe this is unacceptable to many people, but I prefer the interest of my own country, my family and friends. I’m open to help, but again, not at all costs. I don’t see how is it in our interest to be at war with Russia (I’m from Europe).
    - jnsaff2 3y ago
      So aggression gets rewarded by handing them something they wanted. Do you really think that this is the end, this is all they wanted and from now on they are peaceful world citizens? Every time you hand something to aggressors you need to hand them more the next time. How many km between russia and the border of the country where you live? For me it's 0. You either help Ukraine now or be ready to fight yourself sometime in the future. It's like in the winter you are cold and you pee in your pants. It will be warm for a moment end then what?

ponector 3y ago

Nuclear weapon in current world is an expensive show of power, but completely useless. No one can use it. If you think that after retreat from Ukraine Russian will use nukes - you are consuming too much Russian propaganda.

mdavid626 3y ago
I think you misunderstood me. I meant last, last resort. When Russia’s existence is threatened, when they have no other options, I think they won’t hesitate to blow up the whole world.

webknjaz 3y ago

This viewpoint couldn't be more ruscist. Why do you push the terrorist mass murderer propaganda so hard?