They do have a speech-controlling agenda (I am not commenting on whether this is positive or negative here) in that this also relates to "illegal content", whic

They do have a speech-controlling agenda (I am not commenting on whether this is positive or negative here) in that this also relates to "illegal content", which can be something factual but still illegal to publish. For instance videos of the 7th October attacks made by Hamas are likely illegal: ""Content circulating online that can be associated to Hamas qualifies as terrorist content, is illegal, and needs to be removed under both the Digital Services Act and Terrorist Content Online Regulation," a Commission spokesperson said." [1] Precedent in France is that this is understood to apply even if the content is published to denounce those facts. [1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-67073956 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-67073956