3 ms·
> It certainly isn't good for Adobe It is good for Adobe: they'll be forced to make their products better. ...I hope!
by DaiPlusPlus 3y ago
> It certainly isn't good for Adobe
It is good for Adobe: they'll be forced to make their products better.
...I hope!
- tonyedgecombe 3y ago>It is good for Adobe: they'll be forced to make their products bette Which they thought was harder than spending $20 billion acquiring a competitor.
- xbar 3y agoMaybe it would be more accurate to say that they that there is no way for them to make a product that will steal Figma's market for less than $20 billion. Adobe's despised reputation in business practices makes it hard for users to choose Adobe when any other creative option when it is available.
- delecti 3y agoThat would certainly be good for Adobe's users, but it means they'll have to put in a lot of work, which costs money that could otherwise buy so many yachts.