2 ms·
They couldn't acquire Figma for $20 billion but that doesn't mean Figma isn't acquirable. It just means the founders and investors get a bit less. > and streng
by tonyedgecombe 3y ago
They couldn't acquire Figma for $20 billion but that doesn't mean Figma isn't acquirable. It just means the founders and investors get a bit less.
> and strengthening the situation for the cash-rich behemoths like Microsoft, Google, etc.
It certainly isn't good for Adobe as they will have a strong competitor in Figma to deal with.
- DaiPlusPlus 3y ago> It certainly isn't good for Adobe It is good for Adobe: they'll be forced to make their products better. ...I hope!
- tonyedgecombe 3y ago>It is good for Adobe: they'll be forced to make their products bette Which they thought was harder than spending $20 billion acquiring a competitor.
- xbar 3y agoMaybe it would be more accurate to say that they that there is no way for them to make a product that will steal Figma's market for less than $20 billion. Adobe's despised reputation in business practices makes it hard for users to choose Adobe when any other creative option when it is available.
- delecti 3y agoThat would certainly be good for Adobe's users, but it means they'll have to put in a lot of work, which costs money that could otherwise buy so many yachts.