3 ms·
Well, i think it's strange to assume a serious artist would just take the first crop given to them and not alter at all! After all, there are numerous ai tools
by wholinator2 3y ago
Well, i think it's strange to assume a serious artist would just take the first crop given to them and not alter at all! After all, there are numerous ai tools for altering ai images to fit your choices better. You simply pick the best template and then direct the AI, with intent, at exactly which parts of the image you'd like changed and into what. It's a delicate balance of prompt engineering (knowing exactly what to say, sometimes terms not know by the lay public become necessary for the best creation of your idea), and actually having an artistic idea in mind. It takes inspiration, tact, composition, knowledge, etc.
Sure, putting in "throwing up technicolor on the burger king riding a giant snail" is incredibly easy. Being able to fix everything the AI cannot interpret about your ideal, let alone having an ideal strong enough to differ from what your presented is artistic. I'm well aware there are people vehemently opposed to this idea, but there should be an advocate for the opposition
- danielbln 3y agoI concur, and I don't understand why a lot of artists still talk about AI art as if prompt -> end result is the only way of interacting with these systems. That may have been true in Spring of last year, but entire pipelines, flows, tool integrations, models etc. have been created since then. To really excert control over the generative process, you need more than Dall-E through ChatGPT, you need ControlNet, you need various models, and so on. It's technical artistry as 3D modeling is technical artistry.