4 ms·
Not if you adjust for cost. 7900XTX is much better value raster in everything except perhaps raytracing (although even then there are some implementations where
by hackerlight 3y ago
Not if you adjust for cost. 7900XTX is much better value raster in everything except perhaps raytracing (although even then there are some implementations where 7900XTX is better).
Gamers buy 4090 only because DLSS is significantly better than FSR.
- whalesalad 3y agoNo one with a 4090 is using dlss. The input latency is noticeable.
- maximus_prime 3y agoYou're talking about the frame generation part. Without it, DLSS upscaling introduces no perceivable input lag.
- beebeepka 3y agoIt's totally perceivable, though.
- hackerlight 3y agoThe superior ML upscaling of DLSS is the why Nvidia dominates the gaming sector. AMD's FSR upscaler introduces noticeable atrefacts and aliasing especially during motion, the tech isn't close.
- msp26 3y agoIt's nice for path traced cyberpunk
- girvo 3y agoBetter value I absolutely understand. But I thought they were claiming its out and out better/superior? As far as I was aware, the 4090 still edges out the 7900XTX in pure raster in most games, but again I'm not certain on that
- hackerlight 3y agoI think you are right, 4090 is slightly better in most games, but at a much larger cost.