Well, obviously the resolution of this apparent paradox is that things/objects don't actually have any "identity" immanent to them, although in most practical c

Well, obviously the resolution of this apparent paradox is that things/objects don't actually have any "identity" immanent to them, although in most practical circumstances a notion of objects having identities is both useful and roughly accurate. Which is what the deflationist explanation from the page seems to allude to?