3 ms·
What? I was replying to your claim "The core problem people have with TikTok", which is about TT, not NYT. My point is that it's not the core problem people ha
by mgraczyk 3y ago
What? I was replying to your claim "The core problem people have with TikTok", which is about TT, not NYT.
My point is that it's not the core problem people have with tiktok in this case. Currently every top level comment here that is critical of TikToker behavior is complaining about exploitation, not lack of factuality. The original article also does not complain about lack of factuality, primarily focusing on exploitation.
Since every top level comment here and all the articles shared about tiktok refer to exploitation and not factuality, it's not the case that "The core problem people have with TikTok spectacle is it is less factual and not substantive.", if by "people " you are referring to HN commenters or people interviewed by the guardian, or the authors of the guardian piece. NYT is silent on the issue since their piece was written months ago.
- pseudalopex 3y ago> What? I was replying to your claim "The core problem people have with TikTok", which is about TT, not NYT. The context you chose was equating NYT and TikTok. People have more than 1 core problem with TikTok of course. > My point is that it's not the core problem people have with tiktok in this case. Currently every top level comment here that is critical of TikToker behavior is complaining about exploitation, not lack of factuality. The top level comments critical of TikTok spectacle were about consent mostly. And I reject considering top level comments only.