4 ms·
> Debts just need to be cancelled. It's AFAIK that's unconstitutional in the US at least.
by qwytw 3y ago
> Debts just need to be cancelled. It's
AFAIK that's unconstitutional in the US at least.
- toast0 3y agoWhich part of the US Constitution does cancelling Argentine debts fall afoul of? Cancelling US debt without consent of the lenders would likely be unconstitutional, but the article seemed to be discussing IMF loans, and I don't think the US has taken any of those.