2 ms·
> Intel and AMD are not doing that because both hope to replace CUDA with their proprietary equivalents, instead of an open GPU API Like AMD did with FreeSync
by jorvi 3y ago
> Intel and AMD are not doing that because both hope to replace CUDA with their proprietary equivalents, instead of an open GPU API
Like AMD did with FreeSync (now VRR) and FSR3 (whatever open standard it will morph into)?
I'll never understand the hate AMD gets from the open source community. Mind-boggling.
- 7speter 3y agoIsn’t Intel’s solution oneAPI, which is supposed to be open and have a sort of translation layer for CUDA?
- trelane 3y ago> I'll never understand the hate AMD gets from the open source community. Mind-boggling. A large part of that hate is that, for a very long time, they had the worst of both worlds: a fragile proprietary driver and subpar performance. Only recently have they fixed both. Indeed I only found out about their newfound openness a few years ago. Not everyone has gotten the memo.