> if he is allowed to have a Doomsday bunker Who exactly needs to allow him? This is a free country. If he has the money (and he does) and wants to set it on f

> if he is allowed to have a Doomsday bunker Who exactly needs to allow him? This is a free country. If he has the money (and he does) and wants to set it on fire, he can do that. If he wants to build a Doomsday bunker, it's his choice. It's not all that different from setting his money on fire, but why would I, or you, care?