> Goodreads really has only one thing going for it: a pristine data set of books, authors, cover images, etc. There are so many other reading apps with a better

> Goodreads really has only one thing going for it: a pristine data set of books, authors, cover images, etc. There are so many other reading apps with a better UX but they are frustrating to use because the data is spotty or low quality. And spoilers in book titles (the goodread ones, not the physical books) Just a quick search for "a shocking twist" on goodreads finds many many books: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/198614844-the-perfect-family https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/198614844-the-perfect-fa... https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/137436113-1800198272-978-1800198272-a-book-the-family-across-the-street https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/137436113-1800198272-978... (i have no idea who/what inputed the title here...) and how "unputdownable" is a word... https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/30514112-the-sister?from_search=true&from_srp=true&qid=QUX0u4UTxJ&rank=7 https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/30514112-the-sister?from... ... i'll see the twist coming, you just told me about it! ... Great, now I know that the killer (or whatever) they catch right before the end isn't the real one, and that there will be a twist in the last few pages.