4 ms·

FYI, "hate" means anything the author of the article disagrees with. Before Elon Musk took over Twitter, the anti-white bias was well documented. If you posted

FYI, "hate" means anything the author of the article disagrees with. Before Elon Musk took over Twitter, the anti-white bias was well documented. If you posted "I hate white people," that was OK. If you posted "I hate black people," that violated the rules. Now the rules are less biased, though there is still an anti-white-straight-Christian-conservative-male bias.

analognoise 3y ago
[flagged]
- asguy 3y ago
  This is exactly the problem. Have /you/ contemplated what would happen if you applied that reasoning to any other group (e.g. Jews, Blacks, Oracle employees)?
  - analognoise 3y ago
    Anybody who derives their identity from their nomenclature quadruple of skin-color-religion-politics-sex sucks. Don’t have a problem with white people, Christians, conservatives (the old kind who put America first and didn’t want to reduce the rights of others) and men. Combine all those? Clearly a stunted individual that’s deeply disliked and they know it. Like what kind of man is so lacking in self-assured manliness that they need to include "male" in their identifier? What type of Christian needs to shout loudly near the temple about their faith? Etc. Have you ever met anybody reasonable who described themselves as a name quad that includes their skin color, sex, politics and religion? I haven’t. I keep trying to come up with a name quad that wouldn't sound super annoying in a hypothetical Twitter bio and I can't find a single combination that doesn't sound like a crazy person.
- thfuran 3y ago
  If you feel justified in actively disliking all members of a particular demographic group because of the beliefs or actions of other members of the demographic, you're either racist or, if that demographic happens not to align with race, merely morally equivalent.
  - analognoise 3y ago
    “White conservative Christian male” is absolutely a dog whistle for Christofascists nobody is a fan of.
john015 3y ago
[dead]

analognoise 3y ago

[flagged]

asguy 3y ago
This is exactly the problem. Have /you/ contemplated what would happen if you applied that reasoning to any other group (e.g. Jews, Blacks, Oracle employees)?
- analognoise 3y ago
  Anybody who derives their identity from their nomenclature quadruple of skin-color-religion-politics-sex sucks. Don’t have a problem with white people, Christians, conservatives (the old kind who put America first and didn’t want to reduce the rights of others) and men. Combine all those? Clearly a stunted individual that’s deeply disliked and they know it. Like what kind of man is so lacking in self-assured manliness that they need to include "male" in their identifier? What type of Christian needs to shout loudly near the temple about their faith? Etc. Have you ever met anybody reasonable who described themselves as a name quad that includes their skin color, sex, politics and religion? I haven’t. I keep trying to come up with a name quad that wouldn't sound super annoying in a hypothetical Twitter bio and I can't find a single combination that doesn't sound like a crazy person.
thfuran 3y ago
If you feel justified in actively disliking all members of a particular demographic group because of the beliefs or actions of other members of the demographic, you're either racist or, if that demographic happens not to align with race, merely morally equivalent.
- analognoise 3y ago
  “White conservative Christian male” is absolutely a dog whistle for Christofascists nobody is a fan of.

john015 3y ago

[dead]