4 ms·
I wonder if a subject has to train it first, such as by reading a bunch of prompts while trying to imagine them. Or, are our linguistic neural networks all very
by spookybones 3y ago
I wonder if a subject has to train it first, such as by reading a bunch of prompts while trying to imagine them. Or, are our linguistic neural networks all very similar? If the former is true, it would at least be a bit harder to work as a polygraph. You wouldn't be able to just strap on the helmet and read someone's thoughts accurately.
- dexwiz 3y agoI wonder if you could develop techniques to combat it, like a psychic nail in the shoe. Or maybe an actual nail. How useful is a mind reader when all it reads is “PAIN!”
- RaftPeople 3y agoYes it requires training for each individual. In addition, they tested using a trained model from one person to try to decode a different person and the results were no better than chance. They also said that the person must cooperate for the decoding to work, meaning the person could reduce the decoding accuracy by thinking of specific things (e.g. counting). CORRECTION: The paper I read was not the correct paper, ignore this comment. The actual paper states that the model is transferrable across subjects.
- admax88qqq 3y ago> and read someone's thoughts *accurately* Sadly accuracy has not been a big concern historically of polygraphs and much of forensic "science".