4 ms·
The article specifically states it’s not a mammal. It has been classified as a mosasaur. Jurassic World movie fans may be familiar with mosasaur.
by runjake 3y ago
The article specifically states it’s not a mammal. It has been classified as a mosasaur.
Jurassic World movie fans may be familiar with mosasaur.
- steve1977 3y ago> Jurassic World movie fans may be familiar with mosasaur. Jurassic World fans and parents of 3 year old boys
- HarHarVeryFunny 3y agoYeah, but at 6m a mini Mosasaur, since some could grow to 17m. There was also a very recent UK find of a large Pliosaur (Plesiosaur), which coexisted with Mosasaurs, and at 10m might have eaten this Japanese one for lunch. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-67650247 https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-67650247
- Tagbert 3y agoThat was a pliosaur in the movie, not a mosasaur.
- runjake 3y agoThey refer to it as a mosasaur[1] in the movie, take it up with them? 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurassic_World#Plot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurassic_World#Plot (or watch)
- yencabulator 3y agoIn the grand old tradition of Jurassic Park "velociraptors".