5 ms·
That's not all that's required. You're supposed to work under the supervision of a Professional Engineer for a few years as well as taking and passing an ethic
by canucker2016 3y ago
That's not all that's required.
You're supposed to work under the supervision of a Professional Engineer for a few years as well as taking and passing an ethics course.
Then you can call yourself a P.Eng. (i.e. "John Smith, P.Eng." )
https://engineerscanada.ca/become-an-engineer/overview-of-licensing-process https://engineerscanada.ca/become-an-engineer/overview-of-li...
- out-of-ideas 3y agowhat bothers me the most is here is an ambigious shortening of a phrase "professional enginner" (or P.Eng.) which I would be fine to say, yes, dont call yourself a P.Eng. when that is part of a cult/guild/group/ect; but then it is also restricted is the "generalized" term of it. all of the other points folks write about actually add-more-details, but in this case they're restricting the detail-removed form; bummer for them and I hope that "confusion" (enforced by the "Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists", (maybe we should abbreviate them as "Ass. of PEG") ) is one day better handeled and not restricting a general term edit: can you call yourself an engineer but not part of ass of peg in the same sentence/paragraph?
- causality0 3y agoThen you can call yourself a P.Eng. (i.e. "John Smith, P.Eng." ) But he doesn't do that. He just describes himself as an engineer.