3 ms·
> It is a lot safer than paragliding because you'll crack the landing gear or the tail and not your spine on a bad landing Many years ago I did both skydiving
by KineticLensman 3y ago
> It is a lot safer than paragliding because you'll crack the landing gear or the tail and not your spine on a bad landing
Many years ago I did both skydiving and paragliding. For skydiving, in approx 70 jumps I had one slightly twisted ankle (which was actually an earlier injury that had weakened the ankle) and saw one situation where a jumper was stretchered away (they landed on their backside because they were trying to hit a target with outstretched legs. I also had a parachute malfunction and safely deployed my reserve. In paraglidimg, over a shorter timeframe, two people in the club received bad injuries (broken leg and broken hip) and another smashed their helmet in a collision with a dry-stone wall.
The problem with paragliding seemed to be that canopies could collapse at very low altitude due to air turbulence (rotors) around the tops of hills where flights started and usually ended. In contrast, in parachuting from planes, there was 'plenty' of time to deal with parachute opening malfunctions (and to open reserves), and it was rare for canopies to then fail due to wind or terrain.
- mordechai9000 3y agoI flirted briefly with the thought of taking up paragliding. I was put off by the statistics. It's significantly more dangerous than flying in a small aircraft. I wonder, though, how much of the risk profile is due to experts pushing the envelope, or combining paragliding with skiing and doing aerobatics close to the ground. The so-called beginner wings are designed to be collapse resistant and recover easily, but they are slow and not very maneuverable compared to the more advanced models.