4 ms·
And then there was Guantanamo, which proves all this stuff in the article is far from being universally accepted.
by isnifailed 3y ago
And then there was Guantanamo, which proves all this stuff in the article is far from being universally accepted.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- acdha 3y agoThis is somewhat true but it’s a reminder of how far out it was: the Bush administration had to invent a new theory of executive privilege to authorize it, did it outside of the country because they knew it wouldn’t be accept by a real court, and then they still felt the need to “accidentally” delete the tapes.
- verisimi 3y agoYes. What nonsense the whole of the legal system is. And people think it is about justice. If justice occurs on account of the legal system, its a happy accident, not by design!
- wolverine876 3y agoThis attitude prevents real progress, and results in additional injustice. The legal system is imperfect, and very flawed in some respects. The way forward is to understand the mechanism, and improve it, relentlessly. In the end it's a human institution and will be flawed, but that's all we have - humans all the way down. The people on the sideline saying it's all pointless are not only obstructing those doing actual work, they benefit from the legal system - the work of all these people and generations working toward justice - without contributing their share.
- verisimi 3y agoYou say its pointless standing on the sideline obstructing, whereas I think trying to save a system that cannot deliver justice by design is a waste of effort. Let me know when your relentless effort yields improvement.
- wolverine876 3y agoIt does, unquestionably, and it has, for generations. That's where all the justice you have now comes from, and every day I see improvements. Just as an example, most cities have stopped prosecuting marijuana possession offenses. Not enough, not quickly enough, but that's because you're not helping.
- hooho 3y ago[dead]