4 ms·
SQS is weird in that you can get the same message in Japan and Germany at the exact same time and "race" to process the message. It's annoying af. I do not reco
by withinboredom 3y ago
SQS is weird in that you can get the same message in Japan and Germany at the exact same time and "race" to process the message. It's annoying af. I do not recommend SQS unless you are at some kind of scale (in company/team size, not revenue) where you can deal with it properly.
- icedchai 3y agoI used extensively at a previous company for longer running background tasks. It was simpler to use SQS than dealing with standing up our own RabbitMQ cluster. Their Amazon MQ service did not exist at the time. Our system was built to tolerate duplicates and it worked well enough. For something higher volume I'd definitely use RabbitMQ though.
- withinboredom 3y agoA cluster! Yeah, if you have enough messages warranting a cluster, SQS might be simpler (but probably far more expensive). It's always tradeoffs I guess.