3 ms·
I give Apple a good amount of my personal money every year precisely because Apple works well with Apple, and because when you switch on all the features like A
by nixgeek 3y ago
I give Apple a good amount of my personal money every year precisely because Apple works well with Apple, and because when you switch on all the features like Advanced Data Protection and Lockdown Mode their vertical integration across hardware, software and services gives them a strong security story.
I have Signal and WhatsApp for talking to people on other platforms, and I’m personally fine with Apple maintaining strong control over iMessage and introducing things like Contact Key Verification [1] to further enhance security within that closed system (things like Signal have alternatives to this, too!). That is to say: there’s plenty of competition in cross-platform messaging already, this is good, many of those alternatives have hundreds of millions of users. We’re really not at the point where we need regulators to step in and force Apple to open up iMessage!
[1] https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213465 https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213465
You are obviously free to spend your dollars as you wish, but don’t conflate the lack of interoperability with Android as “making the life of its own customers miserable”, it’s really the opposite: everything Apple works well with Apple and that’s a real upgrade for me and likely others over the piecemeal, fragmented, and harder to secure ecosystem that is Android.
Your opinions likely do vary to my own and that’s why it’s good there are options and competition.
- lxgr 3y agoArguably, messaging life is somewhat miserable due to the existence of various closed systems that force people to install and use multiple messengers concurrently (outside of the US) or fall back to SMS (US). I, as a mostly happy Apple customer, would lose absolutely nothing and in fact gain quite a lot of convenience if Apple were to allow an Android iMessage client. Sure, running servers isn't free, nor is spam moderation and servicing law enforcement data access requests, but I'm convinced that if they actually wanted to do this, they'd find an agreement that works for every stakeholder financially in no time. This really is exclusively about Apple's bottom line.
- sbuk 3y ago> "This really is exclusively about Apple's bottom line." I'm unconvinced. Like I said further up the thread, the evidence to the contrary of the 'misery' of using other apps is abundant, especially given the standing of iMessage on the global scale.
- paulryanrogers 3y agoApple execs admitted it's about keeping kids on iPhones https://www.thurrott.com/apple/248931/apple-didnt-bring-imessage-to-android-because-of-its-lock-in-strategy https://www.thurrott.com/apple/248931/apple-didnt-bring-imes...