For context, please read the original comment I was replying to. It's a criticism to luxury brands preying on the poorest. If someone is really poor and buys B&

For context, please read the original comment I was replying to. It's a criticism to luxury brands preying on the poorest. If someone is really poor and buys B&O products instead of using the little credit they can access to cover basic needs, the problem is supposed to be B&O greed? It's more a problem of banks' policy or maybe mental health. Should B&O refuse to sell to poor people? When I've seen B&O mentioned, it's usually people bashing them for being mediocre audio quality sold more based on form than substance. That seems to be their business model, maybe a problem for those that have a lot of money to burn. But for the poorest? It's like saying that the problem with Lamborghini is how they squeeze the working class with their prices. There is people addicted to shopping that spends way too much in cheap stuff. Mountains of useless shiny things. This is not about price.