The only reason "values corrected for anomalies that are not an effect of human involvement" would be interesting is to find out whether the effect of human inv

The only reason "values corrected for anomalies that are not an effect of human involvement" would be interesting is to find out whether the effect of human involvement is significant or not. It is a valid question, but we already know the answer, so asking OP to essentially re-do a huge amount of climate science comes off as disingenuous.