3 ms·

If you want to tunnel UDP (WireGuard) or TCP (SSH) over the WebSocket protocol, check out https://github.com/erebe/wstunnel https://github.com/erebe/wstunnel

• kernel_cat 3y ago
  Also https://github.com/nnathan/monopiped https://github.com/nnathan/monopiped. Just plugging my own project.
• PrimeMcFly 3y ago
  Why would you tunnel WireGuard over SSH?
  • tssva 3y ago
    Perhaps reread the comment. It presents info for running Wireguard or SSH over websockets and not running Wireguard over ssh.
  • password4321 3y ago
    Although not relevant to my post above, tunneling WireGuard over SSH sounds like an interesting challenge... Because WireGuard and SSH are at different layers of the network stack, it might be necessary (though slow) to bridge two WireGuard networks through a single TCP socket port-forwarded by SSH. I'm actually curious now what tools would best be used to accomplish this, how much effort would be needed to configure things, and how badly performance would suffer when faced with normal internet traffic congestion.
    • oarsinsync 3y ago
      > I'm actually curious now what tools would best be used to accomplish this “Tunnel UDP over SSH” https://superuser.com/questions/53103/udp-traffic-through-ssh-tunnel https://superuser.com/questions/53103/udp-traffic-through-ss... has some suggestions
• IAmLiterallyAB 3y ago
  Looks neat. Have you looked into using the new WebTransport protocol? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-webtrans-overview-06 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-webtrans-ov... https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-webtrans-http3/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-webtrans-ht... Still early stages, but it looks promising! Notably it supports multiple streams and unreliable datagrams since it goes over QUIC