3 ms·
I had exactly the same reaction as you. I thought it was a metaphor for decades. I think I read about it on Nautilus or Aeon around 2016/17, can't remember. Whe
by Borrible 3y ago
I had exactly the same reaction as you.
I thought it was a metaphor for decades.
I think I read about it on Nautilus or Aeon around 2016/17, can't remember.
When I am fully conscious, there is no inner eye for me, nothing.
Sounds, noises and voices, on the other hand, are not a problem.
I can play mental audio within limits.
Are there actually people who can imagine smells or other sensory impressions at will?
I dream partly in color, partly in black and white, sometimes more, sometimes less realistic in the representation.
So, I know what it must be like to have a minds eye.
When I'm half asleep during the waking/sleeping phase, it seems to me that I can deliberately invoke images. Aphantasia seems to me to be less a lack of functionality than one that is not activated under certain conditions.
It's a spectrum, there are people like me and there are people who can imagine incredibly realistic inner worlds, and I envy them a little.
But I suspect that this characteristic comes with its own problems.
It's a little sad that I can't conjure up mental images of significant personal events, such as the birth of my children.
The first time I held them in my arms.
On the other hand, reports of atrocities and the like do not induce any inner images.
I literally can't imagine anything in them, so they don't trigger a visceral reaction.
That's a plus.