3 ms·
To play devils advocate, there are a few reasons off the top of my head: 1. More people have phones than cars 2. Cars take someone to a general location (i.e
by someotherperson 3y ago
To play devils advocate, there are a few reasons off the top of my head:
1. More people have phones than cars
2. Cars take someone to a general location (i.e a shopping mall carpark) but phones are precise enough to say which section of a store (or hospital) you are in
3. Car manufacturers can't inherently link the passengers of the car to the driver, or to each other
4. Manufacturers of cars don't have ads as a core business model
That's not to say what car manufacturers are doing isn't scummy -- it deserves more light. But what Google does affects more people in a much more complex way. Google doing this essentially takes attention away from these smaller cases of privacy violations -- if the Google issue is solved (and I'm using Google here as a supplement for "phone tracking") then the world would turn their focus to the smaller issues like car tracking.
- HumblyTossed 3y ago2. Often that would be enough if other pieces of data can be linked to that time and location. 3. No, but based on driving patterns and sensor data, police can infer certain things. 4. Very soon. Very very soon.