> and take responsibility for it, since machines cannot take responsibility for things. That's an interesting thought; people "taking responsibility" as a fo

> and take responsibility for it, since machines cannot take responsibility for things. That's an interesting thought; people "taking responsibility" as a form of labour, for machines that stole their lunch. Probably be around zero applicants for that job. Responsibility is a complex quality needing capacity and competence. Right now even the manufacturers of "AI" are unable to assert much about behaviour. Where "responsibility" exists around robotics and ML it will more likely be a blunt legal instrument tied to ownership, like owning a dangerous animal.