3 ms·
The LaMDA is sentient guy gave me the impression of being a bit nuts. I'm sure google would show their weight and out-compete openai if they could. We all know
by dindobre 3y ago
The LaMDA is sentient guy gave me the impression of being a bit nuts. I'm sure google would show their weight and out-compete openai if they could. We all know all this "AI safety" is for show, right?
- staunton 3y ago> We all know all this "AI safety" is for show, right? No. A lot of people think it really matters A lot of other people pretend to care about it because it also enables stifling the competition and attempting regulatory capture. But it's not all of them.
- snewman 3y agoI'm personally devoting my career to AI safety, on a volunteer basis, because I think it's is legitimately of high importance. (See my blog, e.g. https://amistrongeryet.substack.com/p/implications-of-agi https://amistrongeryet.substack.com/p/implications-of-agi, if you want to understand where I'm coming from.) What makes you think it is for show?
- y04nn 3y agoNo, it's for brand safety and reputation. In 2016 Microsoft released Tay [1] without or lacking guards and it ended up being a failure and hurter the Microsoft brand. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(chatbot) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(chatbot)