>Isn’t this bill supposed to “protect children”? Yes. >Accessing porn isn’t illegal for adults. Correct. Porn isn't illegal for adults now, nor will it be il

>Isn’t this bill supposed to “protect children”? Yes. >Accessing porn isn’t illegal for adults. Correct. Porn isn't illegal for adults now, nor will it be illegal if the bill becomes law. >If the debate is about restricting access to a legal “vice” It isn't. >I agree imposing puritanical beliefs is the actual motivation I don't agree. You're blowing a single word out of proportion.