2 ms·
I'm a little concerned that degoogling would be necessary. I don't follow. The readme specifically says it's not in scope. How much of the user's privacy is t
by secureblue 3y ago
I'm a little concerned that degoogling would be necessary.
I don't follow. The readme specifically says it's not in scope.
How much of the user's privacy is this thing selling away in the name of "security"?
Nothing more or less than upstream fedora. The point of putting that in there is to make it so we don't get people opening issues to ask us to switch to Brave or what have you.
tradeoff
Yes, it's a tradeoff and it's made clear in the readme that we're doing this.
Why should I trust this? It's an unofficial respin by an anonymous user; why would a user trust it?
I would have the same question :)
As I said in another comment: All of the CICD is completely open and transparent. You can read through the github actions logs and build config to verify everything for yourself if you want.
- secureblue 3y agoAs a follow up to this, given that bubblewrap-suid without userns vs bubblewrap with userns is a tradeoff, I could make it so both variants are published. This would give users choice between the two and be less opinionated. If this is wanted please open an issue for it and I'll add it.
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y ago> I don't follow. The readme specifically says it's not in scope. Let me rephrase: What is your distro doing that would make someone want to degoogle it?
- secureblue 3y agoWhat is your distro doing that would make someone want to degoogle it? Certain users have expressed a preference towards Brave instead of Chromium because in their view Brave's "degoogling" of chromium is preferable. That line is in the readme to clarify that this is not a concern for the project and not in scope.
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y agoIf that's what you mean, I would strongly suggest just saying that in the readme
- secureblue 3y agoJust changed it. Thanks for the feedback!