Yeah, that's an interesting detail. "Employee ownership" is not really a legal term, or rather, is applied to a wide variety of legal arrangements. Most of thes

Yeah, that's an interesting detail. "Employee ownership" is not really a legal term, or rather, is applied to a wide variety of legal arrangements. Most of these do not actually give employees the powers the term suggests to many: to nominate and vote for board members, to recall them, etc. I am a socialist, but I don't think it requires understanding of the socialist critique of capitalist social relations to see that worker ownership is not a generally applicable model for extending economic self-determination.