4 ms·
> the government was becoming dissatisfied with the obstruction of criminal investigations that strict adherence to the rule engendered Also > The Court recog
by hypothesis 3y ago
> the government was becoming dissatisfied with the obstruction of criminal investigations that strict adherence to the rule engendered
Also
> The Court recognized that while the rejection of the mere evidence rule may "enlarge the area of permissible searches," the protections of the 4th Amendment, like the reasonableness and warrant requirements, would sufficiently safeguard the right to privacy.
So SCOTUS think that government would be satisfied with Bill of Rights. What if government thinks it is just too frustrating to follow laws?
- abfan1127 3y agowhat do you mean, "what if?"? Its already there. There's plenty of examples. For instance, the FBI is involved in background checks for gun purchases in the US. They are legally required to destroy any results of said check. They have not (to my knowledge) ever passed an audit.
- spicybright 3y agoYou would think they be forced to stop if they consistently can't pass audit. That would make too much sense though.
- Geisterde 3y agoThe pentagon announced it had misplaced 2.1 trillion dollars on september 10, 2001. It hasnt gotten better.
- repeekad 3y agohttps://apnews.com/article/fact-check-us-government-trillions-lost-sept-11-670264168912 https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-us-government-trillion...
- Geisterde 3y agoI dont know what this is supposed to imply, they misplaced the money, they couldnt pass audit and decades later they still fail every audit. The implications being, widespread waste fraud and abuse could have taken place and we have no records to hold those responsoble to account. In reality, of course there was widespread waste fraud and abuse, it seems all of our guns keep ending up in the hands of nazis and islamic extremists so this one isnt hard to figure out.